The University of Texas at Austin

Current Patent Legal Literature

About the “Current Patent Legal Literature” website:

The "Current Patent Legal Literature" website is a resource for keeping informed of current articles related to U.S. patent law. This service is edited by Jane O'Connell, Associate director for patron services, instruction & research at the Tarlton Law Library.

Law Library staff reviews law journals and law reviews (and a great many other legal periodicals) as they are received in the library. We examine the table of contents of all of these publications and identify any article concerning U.S. patent law. We then input the basic bibliographic information about each article into this database, and scan the first page of the article. The availability of the first page of the article should better enable readers to know if they are interested in reading the whole article. Articles will be added two to three times a week, depending on the volume of cites.

This page is RSS-enabled. Subscribe to the RSS feed using a feed reader, or RSS-enabled browser (Firefox, Safari, or IE 7) to receive automatic notices of updates. The RSS feed address is http://tarlton.webhost.utexas.edu/patent/rss.cfm.

The Library provides this service under the “fair use” provision of U.S. patent law. Only the first page of an article will be scanned, and images will be deleted after 60 days. This service is for non-commercial, educational purposes only.

If you have any comments about this service, please contact Jane O'Connell, .

Click article title to view a .pdf file of its first page.
Articles are listed in reverse chronological order:
November 4, 2009

Author: Christopher A. Cotopia
Title: Modernizing Patent Law's Inequitable Conduct Doctrine
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 723 (2009)

Author: Davida H. Isaacs and Robert M. Farley
Title: Privilege-Wise and Patent (and Trade Secret) Foolish? How the Courts' Misapplication of the Military and State Secrets Privilege Violates the Constitution and Endangers National Security
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 785 (2009)

Author: Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss and Lawrence S. Pope
Title: Dethroning Lear? Incentives to Innovate after MedImmune
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 971 (2009)

Author: Adam J. Sibley and Rodney L. Sparks, J.D., Ph.D.
Title: The Difficulty of Determining Joint Inventorship, Especially with Regard to Novel Chemical Compounds and Their Applications
Citation: 8 Loyola Law and Technology Annual 44 (2009)

Author: Christopher C. Anderson
Title: NOTE, Patents on Tax Strategies: Just Another Harmless Subject
Citation: 2009 University of Illinois Law Review 1591 (2009)

Author: Yuichi Watanabe
Title: NOTE, Patent Licensing and the Emergence of a New Patent Market
Citation: 9 Houston Business and Tax Law Journal 445 (2009)

October 21, 2009

Author: Luigi Palombi
Title: Beyond Recombinant Technology: Synthetic Biology and Patentable Subject Matter
Citation: 12 Journal of World Intellectual Property 371 (2009)

Author: Megan Richardson
Title: Patents and Exhibitions
Citation: 12 Journal of World Intellectual Property 402 (2009)

Author: Ann L. Monotti
Title: The Australian Experimental Use Exemption: A Current Overview
Citation: 12 Journal of World Intellectual Property 422 (2009)

Author: Susy Frankel
Title: An Experimental Use Exception from Patent Infringement for New Zealand
Citation: 12 Journal of World Intellectual Property 446 (2009)

Author: Fiona Rotstein and Chris Dent
Title: Third-Party Patent Challenges in Europe, the United States and Australia: A Comparative Analysis
Citation: 12 Journal of World Intellectual Property 467 (2009)

Author: Kimberlee Weatherall
Title: It's Not Just Competitors: Acknowledging and Accommodating "Interfering Busybodies" and their Challenges to Patent Validity
Citation: 12 Journal of World Intellectual Property 500 (2009)

Author: Susan Glazebrook
Title: A Specialist Patent or Intellectual Property Court for New Zealand?
Citation: 12 Journal of World Intellectual Property 524 (2009)

Author: Bruce H. Kobayashi and Joshua D. Wright
Title: Federalism, Substantive Preemption, and Limits on Antitrust: An Application to Patent Holdup
Citation: 5 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 469 (2009)

Author: David A. Haynes
Title: The Patentee and the Infringer Battlefront Worsens as Courts Sharpen the Infringer's Sword
Citation: 29 Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review 407 (2009)

October 13, 2009

Author: Andrew T. Dufresne
Title: NOTE, The Exhaustion Doctrine Revived? Assessing the Scope and Possible Effects of the Supreme Court's Quanta Decision
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 11 (2009)

Author: Justin M. Lee
Title: NOTE, The Board Bites Back: Bilski and the B.P.A.I.
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 49 (2009)

Author: Stephen M. Ullmer
Title: NOTE, Paice Yourselves: A Basic Framework for Ongoing Royalty Determinations in Patent Law
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 75 (2009)

Author: Tolga S. Gulmen
Title: NOTE, Model Jury Instructions on Nonobviousness in the Wake of KSR: The Northern District of California's Approach
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 99 (2009)

Author: Miles J. Sweet
Title: NOTE, The Patentability of Chiral Drugs Post-KSR: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 129 (2009)

Author: Alice Juwon Ahn
Title: NOTE, Finding Vicarious Liability in U.S. Patent Law: The "Control or Direction" Standard for Joint Infringement
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 149 (2009)

Author: Reed C. McBride
Title: NOTE, City of Hope v. Genentech: Keeping Fiduciary Duties Where They Belong
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 179 (2009)

Author: Andrew S. Robertson
Title: NOTE, Taking Responsiblity: Regulations and Protections in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
Citation: 24 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 213 (2009)

Author: Matthew Herder
Title: Patents and The Progress of Personalized Medicine: Biomarkers Research as Lens
Citation: 18 Annals of Health Law 187 (2009)

Author: Alice O. Martin and Sendil K. Devadas
Title: NOTE, Patents with an "I" = Patients
Citation: 18 Annals of Health Law 261 (2009)

September 28, 2009

Author: Michael A. Carrier
Title: Unsettling Drug Patent Settlements: A Framework for Presumptive Illegality
Citation: 108 Michigan Law Review 37 (2009)

Author: Kevin Emerson Collins
Title: Enabling After-Arising Technology
Citation: 34 Journal of Corporation Law 1083 (2009)

Author: Christopher A. Cotropia
Title: Describing Patents as Real Options
Citation: 34 Journal of Corporation Law 1127 (2009)

Author: Thomas F. Cotter
Title: Patent Holdup, Patent Remedies, and Antitrust Responses
Citation: 34 Journal of Corporation Law 1151 (2009)

Author: Shubha Ghosh
Title: Carte Blanche, Quanta, and Competition Policy
Citation: 34 Journal of Corporation Law 1209 (2009)

Author: Herbert Hovenkamp
Title: Patents, Property, and Competition Policy
Citation: 34 Journal of Corporation Law 1243 (2009)

Author: Christopher R. Leslie
Title: Antitrust and Patent Law as Component Parts of Innovation Policy
Citation: 34 Journal of Corporation Law 1259 (2009)

Author: Jeffrey S. Boone
Title: Patent term extensions for human drugs under the US Hatch-Waxman Act
Citation: 4 Journal of Intellectual Property and Practice 658(2009)

Author: Md. Rizwanul Islam
Title: Should Singapore follow the EU in creating sui generis protection for databases?
Citation: 4 Journal of Intellectual Property and Practice 665 (2009)

September 18, 2009

Author: Bus de Blank and Bing Cheng
Title: Where is the ITC Going After Kyocera?
Citation: 25 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 701 (2009)

Author: Bohrer, Lynde and Morris
Title: The Shifting Sands of Price Erosion: Price Erosion Damages Shift by Tens of Millions of Dollars Depending Upon the Admissibility of Pre-Notice Eroded Prices
Citation: 25 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 723 (2009)

Author: F. Scott Kieff, Robert G. Kramer and Robert M. Kunstadt
Title: It's Your Turn, but It's My Move: Intellectual Property Protection for Sports "Moves"
Citation: 25 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 765 (2009)

Author: Lily Lim and Sarah E. Craven
Title: Injunctions Enjoined; Remedis Restructured
Citation: 25 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 787 (2009)

Author: Michael J. Lyons, Andrew J. Wu and Harry F. Doscher
Title: Exclusion of Downstream Products after Kyocera: A Revised Framework for General Exclusion Orders
Citation: 25 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 839 (2009)

Author: Erik R. Puknys and Jared D. Schuettenhelm
Title: Application of the Inequitable Conduct Doctrine after Kingsdown
Citation: 25 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 839 (2009)

Author: James Ware and Brian Davy
Title: The History, Content, Application and Influence of the Northern District of California's Patent Local Rules
Citation: 25 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 965 (2009)

Author: Gail E. Evans
Title: University Patent Licensing for the Research and Development of Pharmaceuticals in Developing Countries
Citation: 3 Intellectual Property Quarterly 311 (2009)

September 9, 2009

Author: Tom Irving, Lauren L. Stevens, Ph.D., and Scott M. K. Lee, Ph.D.
Title: Nonobviousness in the U.S. Post-KSR for Innovative Drug Companies
Citation: 34 University of Dayton Law Review 157 (2009)

Author: Kathryn T. Ng
Title: COMMENT, Tax Strategy Patents: Close Pandora's Box on Patenting Criminal Defense Strategies
Citation: 34 University of Dayton Law Review 253 (2009)

Author: Christopher M. Holman
Title: Learning from Litigation: What Can Lawsuits Teach Us About the Role of Human Gene Patents in Research and Innovation?
Citation: 18 Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy 215 (2009)

Author: Courtney C. Scala
Title: NOTE, Making the Jump from Gene Pools to Patent Pools: How Patent Pools Can Facilitate the Development of Pharmacogenomics
Citation: 41 Connecticut Law Review 1631 (2009)

Author: Erin Julia Daida Austin
Title: NOTE, Reconciling the Patent Exhaustion and Conditional Sale Doctrines in Light of Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics
Citation: 30 Cardozo Law Review 2947 (2009)

Author: Aaron J. Zakem
Title: NOTE, Rethinking Patentable Subject Matter: Are Statutory Categories Useful?
Citation: 30 Cardozo Law Review 2983 (2009)

Author: Christopher M. Jackson
Title: COMMENT, The War on Drugs: How KSR v. Teleflex and Merck v. Integra Continue the Erosion of Pharmaceutical Patent Protection
Citation: 36 Capital University Law Review 1029 (2009)

August 21, 2009

Author: James D. Clements
Title: Improving Bayh-Dole: A Case for Inventor Ownership of Federally Sponsored Research Patents
Citation: 49 IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review 469 (2009)

Author: Thomas G. Hungar
Title: Observations Regarding the Supreme Court's Decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.
Citation: 49 IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review 517 (2009)

Author: Robert A. Matthews, Jr.
Title: Legal Nuances When a Patent-Holding Company Seeks to Enforce a U.S. Patent
Citation: 49 IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review 549 (2009)

Author: Dariush Keyhani
Title: Patent Law in the Global Economy: A Modest Proposal for U.S. Patent Law and Infringement Without Borders
Citation: 54 Villanova Law Review 291 (2009)

Author: Ryan Crockett
Title: NOTE, Balancing Burdens for Accused Infringers: How In re Seagate Got it Right
Citation: 58 DePaul Law Review 1047 (2009)

Author: Jun Wu
Title: NOTE, Rewinding Time: Advances in Mitigating Hindsight Bias in Patent Obviousness Analysis
Citation: 97 Kentucky Law Journal 565 (2009)

Author: Ho-Sung Chung
Title: The Supreme Court Unjustly Declares Open Season on Patent Dealers
Citation: 2009 University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology and Policy 227 (2009)

Author: Joseph M. Barich
Title: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, In re Bilski - Recent Developments in Method Claiming
Citation: 2009 University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology and Policy 251 (2009)

Author: Benton C. Martin
Title: COMMENT, The American Models of Technology Transfer: Contextualized Emulation by Developing Countries?
Citation: 18 Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal 104 (2009)

Author: Meng Ouyang
Title: NOTE, The Procedural Impact of KSR on Patent Litigation
Citation: 18 Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal 158 (2009)

August 3, 2009

Author: Michael Abramowicz and John F. Duffy
Title: Ending the Patenting Monopoly
Citation: 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1541 (2009)

Author: David S. Abrams
Title: Did TRIPS Spur Innovation? An Analysis of Patent Duration and Incentives to Innovate
Citation: 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1613 (2009)

Author: Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
Title: Fence Posts or Sign Posts? Rethinking Patent Claim Construction
Citation: 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1743 (2009)

Author: F. Scott Kieff
Title: The Case for Preferring Patent-Validity Litigation over Second-Window Review and Gold-Plated Patents: When One Size Doesn't Fit All, How Could Two Do the Trick?
Citation: 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1937 (2009)

Author: Clarissa Long
Title: The PTO and the Market for Influence in Patent Law
Citation: 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1965 (2009)

Author: R. Polk Wagner
Title: Understanding Patent-Quality Mechanisms
Citation: 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2135 (2009)

Author: Ariel Simon
Title: SYMPOSIUM SCHOLAR, Reinventing Discovery: Patent Law's Characterizations of and Inverventions upon Science
Citation: 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2175 (2009)

Author: Kali Murray and Dmitriy Vinarov
Title: Rethinking Patent Fraud Enforcement in a Reform Era
Citation: 13 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 263 (2009)

Author: Amy Tindell
Title: Toward a More Reliable Fact-Finder in Patent Litigation
Citation: 13 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 309 (2009)

Author: Marketa Trimble
Title: EMERGING SCHOLARS SERIES, Cross-Border Injunctions in U.S. Patent Cases and Their Enforcement Actions
Citation: 13 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 331 (2009)

Author: Renee E. Metzler
Title: COMMENT, Not All Grace Periods are Created Equal: Building a Grace Period from the Ground Up
Citation: 13 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 371 (2009)

Author: Kevin Rizzuto
Title: COMMENT, Fixing Continuing Application Practice at the USPTO
Citation: 13 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 411 (2009)

Author: John F. Duffy
Title: ESSAY, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?
Citation: 77 George Washington Law Review 904 (2009)

Author: Sapna Kumar
Title: The Other Patent Agency: Congressional Regulation of the ITC
Citation: 61 Florida Law Review 529 (2009)

Author: Dr. Andrew W. Torrance and Dr. Bill Tomlinson
Title: Patent Expertise and the Regress of Useful Arts
Citation: 33 Southern Illinois University Law Review 239 (2009)

Author: Benjamin Ikuta
Title: Genetically Modified Plants, Patents, and Terminator Technology: The Destruction of the Tradition of Seed Saving
Citation: 35 Ohio Northern University Law Review 731 (2009)

Author: F.M. Scherer
Title: The Political Economy of Patent Policy Reform in the United States
Citation: 7 Journal on Telecommunication and High Technology Law 167 (2009)

Author: Alfred C. Server, M.D., Ph.D., Nader Mousavi, and Jane M. Love, Ph.D.
Title: Reach-Through Rights and the Patentability, Enforcement, and Licensing of Patents on Drug Discovery Tools
Citation: 1 Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal 21 (2009)

July 21, 2009

Author: Hon. S. Jay Plager
Title: Keynote Address: Symposium, Frontiers in Empirical Patent Law Scholarship
Citation: 87 North Carolina Law Review 1323 (2009)

Author: Jay P. Kesan & Andres A. Gallo
Title: The Political Economy of the Patent System
Citation: 87 North Carolina Law Review 1341 (2009)

Author: Christopher A. Cotropia & Mark A. Lemley
Title: Copying in Patent Law
Citation: 87 North Carolina Law Review 1421 (2009)

Author: Glynn S. Lunney, Jr.
Title: Patents and Growth: Empirical Evidence from the States
Citation: 87 North Carolina Law Review 1467 (2009)

Author: Arti K. Rai, John R. Allison & Bhaven N. Sampat
Title: University Software Ownership and Litigation: A First Examination
Citation: 87 North Carolina Law Review 1519 (2009)

Author: Colleen V. Chien
Title: Of Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-Tech Patents
Citation: 87 North Carolina Law Review 1571 (2009)

Author: Andrew Chin
Title: Search for Tomorrow: Some Side Effects of Patent Office Automation
Citation: 87 North Carolina Law Review 1617 (2009)

Author: Katherine J. Strandburg, Gábor Csárdi, Jan Tobochnik & Péter Érdi & László Zalányi
Title: Patent Citation Networks Revisited: Sings of a Twenty-First Century Change?
Citation: 87 North Carolina Law Review 1657 (2009)

Author: Rebecca L. Wolf
Title: Microbicide Development: An Argument for Broadening the Experimental Use Exception
Citation: 4 Journal of Intellectual Property and Practice 485 (2009)

Author: Patricia Cappuyns
Title: The Shape of the Lego Brick is Free for All to Use
Citation: 4 Journal of Intellectual Property and Practice 499 (2009)

Author: Noam Shemtov
Title: The Characteristics of Technical Character of the Ongoing Saga in the EPO the English Courts
Citation: 4 Journal of Intellectual Property and Practice 506 (2009)

July 10, 2009

Author: Adam Mossoff
Title: Exclusion and Exclusive Use in Patent Law
Citation: 22 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 321 (2009)

Author: Lee Petherbridge
Title: Patent Law Uniformity?
Citation: 22 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 421 (2009)

Author: Estelle Derclaye
Title: Patent Law's Role in the Protection of the Environment - Re-Assessing Patent Law and Its Justifications in the 21st Century
Citation: 40 IIC: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 249 (2009)

Author: Huaiwen He
Title: Seeking a Balanced Interpretation of the Three-Step Test - An Adjusted Structure in View of Divergent Approaches
Citation: 40 IIC: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 274 (2009)

Author: Pamela Samuelson
Title: Are Patents on Interfaces Impeding Interoperability?
Citation: 93 Minnesota Law Review 2274 (2009)

Author: Nicole M. Murphy
Title: NOTE, Inequitable-Conduct Doctrine Reform: Is the Death Penalty for Patents Still Appropriate?
Citation: 93 Minnesota Law Review 2274 (2009)

Author: Stanley M. Besen and Robert J. Levinson
Title: Standards, Intellectual Property Disclosure, and Patent Royalties after Rambus
Citation: 10 North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology 233 (2009)

Author: Robert R. Willis
Title: International Patent Law: Should United States and Foreign Patent Laws Be Uniform? An Analysis of the Benefits, Problems, and Barriers
Citation: 10 North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology 283 (2009)

Author: Kristen Osenga
Title: Information May Want to Be Free, But Information Products Do Not: Protecting and Facilitating Transactions in Information Products
Citation: 30 Cardozo Law Review 2099 (2009)

Author: Dariush Keyhani
Title: Permanent Injunctions in Patent Cases
Citation: 6 Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal 1 (2009)

Author: Noel Mendez
Title: COMMENT, Patent Infringers, Come Out with Your Hands Up!: Should the United States Criminalize Patent Infringement?
Citation: 6 Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal 34 (2009)

Author: Tim Volkheimer
Title: STUDENT NOTE, Patents and the Free Movement of Goods: A Shift Toward European Arbitariness?
Citation: 15 Columbia Journal of European Law 495 (2009)

Author: Ashley R. Presson
Title: COMMENT, Patent-Holding Patent Attorneys: Conflicts of Interest, Confidentiality, and Employment Issues
Citation: 40 St. Mary's Law Journal 1039 (2009)

Author: W. Michael Schuster
Title: BOOK REVIEW, Jefferson vs. the Patent Trolls: A Populist Vision of Intellectual Property Rights
Citation: 5 NYU Journal of Law and Business 333 (2009)

July 3, 2009

Author: Cecil D. Quillen, Jr. and Ogden H. Webster
Title: Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - One More Time
Citation: 18 Federal Circuit Bar Journal 379 (2009)

Author: James Juo
Title: Egyptian Goddess: Rebooting Design Patents and Resurrecting Whitman Saddle
Citation: 18 Federal Circuit Bar Journal 427 (2009)

Author: James B. Hughes
Title: Patent Law Through Patent Administration: The First Patent Superintendent's Creation of Reissue Practice and Law
Citation: 18 Federal Circuit Bar Journal 451 (2009)

Author: Andrew Chin
Title: On Abstraction and Equivalence in Software Patent Doctrine: A Response to Bessen, Muerer and Klemens
Citation: 16 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 197 (2009)

Author: Shuba Ghosh
Title: Patenting Games: Baker v.Selden Revisited
Citation: 11 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 871 (2009)

Author: Robert P. Greenspoon
Title: Is the United States Finally Ready for a Patent Small Claims Court?
Citation: 10 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology 549 (2009)

June 22, 2009

Author: Michael J. Chapman
Title: Using Settlement Licenses in Reasonable Royalty Determinations
Citation: 49 IDEA 313 (2009)

Author: MJ Edwards and Donald Steinberg
Title: The Implications of Bilski: Patentable Subject Matter in the United States
Citation: 49 IDEA 411 (2009)

Author: Michael F. Martin
Title: The End of the First-to-Invent Rule: A Concise History of Its Origins
Citation: 49 IDEA 435 (2009)

June 12, 2009

Author: B.D. Daniel
Title: The Right of Trial by Jury in Patent Infringement Cases
Citation: 38 The Review of Litigation 735 (2009)

Author: Christopher Lea Lockwood
Title: COMMENT, Biotechnolgoy Industry Organization v. District of Columbia: A Preemptive Strike Against State Price Restrictions on Prescription Pharmaceuticals
Citation: 19 Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 143 (2009)

Author: Martin S. Masar III
Title: SEMINAR ARTICLE, Effects of the Federal Circuit Judges on Hatch-Waxman Litigation
Citation: 19 Journal of Art, Technology and Intellectual Property Law 315 (2009)

June 11, 2009

Author: Rex W. Miller, II
Title: NOTE: Construing "Offers to Sell" Patent Infringement: Why Economic Interests Rather than Territoriality Should Guide the Construction
Citation: 70 Ohio State Law Journal 403 (2009)

June 5, 2009

Author: Kate McElhone
Title: Inequitable Conduct: Shifting Standards for Patent Applicants, Prosecutors and Litigators
Citation: 17 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 385 (2009)

Author: Ted L. Field
Title: Improving the Federal Circuit's Approach to Choice of Law for Procedural Matters in Patent Cases
Citation: 16 George Mason Law Review 643 (2009)

Author: N. Scott Pierce
Title: Common Sense: Treating Statutory Non-Obviousness as a Novelty Issue
Citation: 25 Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 539 (2009)

Author: Eli Mazour
Title: NOTE, If You Fix It, They Will Come: Drawing Lessons Learned from Patents for Dealing with Rights in Technical Data
Citation: 38 Public Contract Law Journal 667 (2009)

June 3, 2009

Author: C. Scott Hemphill
Title: An Aggregate Approach to Antitrust: Using New Data and Rulemaking to Preserve Drug Competition
Citation: 109 Columbia Law Review 629 (2009)

Author: David L. Schwartz
Title: Courting Specialization: An Empirical Study of Claim Construction Comparing Patent Litigation Before Federal District Courts and the International Trade Commission
Citation: 50 William and Mary Law Review 1699 (2009)

Author: Wan Xiaoli
Title: The Patent Novelty Grace Period in China in Comparative Perspective
Citation: 40 IIC: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 182 (2009)

Author: Lauren Maida
Title: NOTE, Patent Claim Construction: It's Not a Pure Matter of Law, so Why Isn't the Federal Circuit Giving the District Courts the Deference They Deserve?
Citation: 30 Cardozo Law Review 1773 (2009)

May 28, 2009

Author: Riadh Quadir
Title: NOTE, Patent Stalemate: The WTO's Essential Medicines Impasse Between Pharmas and Least Developed Countries
Citation: 61 Rutgers Law Review 437 (2009)

Author: Curtis R. Wright
Title: NOTE, Quanta of Solace?: The Patent Exhaustion Doctrine and Method Patents after Quanta Computers, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.
Citation: 30 University of La Verne Law Review 494 (2009)

Author: Thomas Connors
Title: NOTE, High Score? Subject Matter Patentability of Video Gameplay after In re Bilski
Citation: 30 University of La Verne Law Review 517 (2009)

May 13, 2009

Author: Sivaramjani Thambisetty
Title: Legal Transplants in Patent Law: Why "Utility" is the New "Industrial Applicability"
Citation: 49 Jurimetrics 155 (2009)

Author: David W. Opderbeck
Title: Deconstructing Jefferson's Candle: Toward a Critical Realist Approach to Cultural Environmentalism and Information Policy
Citation: 49 Jurimetrics 203 (2009)

Author: Jonathan Carr
Title: COMMENT, Agreements that Divide: TRIPS v. CBD and Proposals for Mandatory Disclosure of Source and Origin of Genetic Resources in Patent Applications
Citation: 18 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 131 (2008)